The rhetoric around the demonetisation drive has been to flush black money out of the system. The politically charged mission to root corruption out of the system (undoubtedly a noble goal) has obviously gone well with the masses. At least in popular media, many see their troubles as short term sacrifices in pursuit of the long-term goal of corruption free India. In my opinion, Modi has given the common man a sense of purpose in hardship and is getting great political mileage out of it.
Without a quantifiable cost-benefit analysis, the argument that grabbing such low hanging fruit is futile will be speculative. Lack of data will only allow the government to blow its own trumpet.
However, Jean Dreze elaborates on an important point which was also noted on Ajay Shah's blog -
Crooks know better than to keep their illegal income in suitcases of cash. Instead, they spend, invest, launder or convert it in one way or another. They use it to buy property, fund lavish weddings, shop in Dubai or oblige politicians. Of course, at any point of time some black money is likely to be lying in jars or pillow-cases. But going after that residual liquidity is like mopping the floor under the shower. Thinking of it as a decisive strike on the black economy is a severe delusion. This point has already been made by many eminent economists, but the government seems to prefer its own echo chamber.
Besides voluntary disclosures of black money before the Dec 30 deadline, could there be any other proxies to arrive at an approximate figure of black money hoarded in cash prior to the demonetisation announcement? Would it be fair to assume that the quantity of cash not returned in 500/1000 (but the government obviously knows how many notes were printed over time) is the black money which will be eliminated from the system in terms of cash?
Also, I am largely ignorant of the estimated size of total black money. A simple Wiki search puts it in a wide range between 2 billion and 1 trillion dollars. When the size of the pie itself is unknown and if the chunk represented by cash also remains unknown, it will be extremely hard in hindsight to say anything with certainty.
This makes me wonder whether the Govt. was shrewd enough to understand this and let it play out because it knew it could not be questioned with facts. Could this be a precursor to more arbitrary decisions from the government? Although I was pretty enthusiastic about repercussions regarding black money in the beginning, I now find the government's actions very unsettling.




